Source code for pint.pint_eval

"""
    pint.pint_eval
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    An expression evaluator to be used as a safe replacement for builtin eval.

    :copyright: 2016 by Pint Authors, see AUTHORS for more details.
    :license: BSD, see LICENSE for more details.
"""
from __future__ import annotations

import operator
import token as tokenlib
import tokenize
from io import BytesIO
from tokenize import TokenInfo
from typing import Any

try:
    from uncertainties import ufloat

    HAS_UNCERTAINTIES = True
except ImportError:
    HAS_UNCERTAINTIES = False
    ufloat = None

from .errors import DefinitionSyntaxError

# For controlling order of operations
_OP_PRIORITY = {
    "+/-": 4,
    "**": 3,
    "^": 3,
    "unary": 2,
    "*": 1,
    "": 1,  # operator for implicit ops
    "//": 1,
    "/": 1,
    "%": 1,
    "+": 0,
    "-": 0,
}


def _ufloat(left, right):
    if HAS_UNCERTAINTIES:
        return ufloat(left, right)
    raise TypeError("Could not import support for uncertainties")


def _power(left: Any, right: Any) -> Any:
    from . import Quantity
    from .compat import is_duck_array

    if (
        isinstance(left, Quantity)
        and is_duck_array(left.magnitude)
        and left.dtype.kind not in "cf"
        and right < 0
    ):
        left = left.astype(float)

    return operator.pow(left, right)


# https://stackoverflow.com/a/1517965/1291237
class tokens_with_lookahead:
    def __init__(self, iter):
        self.iter = iter
        self.buffer = []

    def __iter__(self):
        return self

    def __next__(self):
        if self.buffer:
            return self.buffer.pop(0)
        else:
            return self.iter.__next__()

    def lookahead(self, n):
        """Return an item n entries ahead in the iteration."""
        while n >= len(self.buffer):
            try:
                self.buffer.append(self.iter.__next__())
            except StopIteration:
                return None
        return self.buffer[n]


def _plain_tokenizer(input_string):
    for tokinfo in tokenize.tokenize(BytesIO(input_string.encode("utf-8")).readline):
        if tokinfo.type != tokenlib.ENCODING:
            yield tokinfo


def uncertainty_tokenizer(input_string):
    def _number_or_nan(token):
        if token.type == tokenlib.NUMBER or (
            token.type == tokenlib.NAME and token.string == "nan"
        ):
            return True
        return False

    def _get_possible_e(toklist, e_index):
        possible_e_token = toklist.lookahead(e_index)
        if (
            possible_e_token.string[0] == "e"
            and len(possible_e_token.string) > 1
            and possible_e_token.string[1].isdigit()
        ):
            end = possible_e_token.end
            possible_e = tokenize.TokenInfo(
                type=tokenlib.STRING,
                string=possible_e_token.string,
                start=possible_e_token.start,
                end=end,
                line=possible_e_token.line,
            )
        elif (
            possible_e_token.string[0] in ["e", "E"]
            and toklist.lookahead(e_index + 1).string in ["+", "-"]
            and toklist.lookahead(e_index + 2).type == tokenlib.NUMBER
        ):
            # Special case: Python allows a leading zero for exponents (i.e., 042) but not for numbers
            if (
                toklist.lookahead(e_index + 2).string == "0"
                and toklist.lookahead(e_index + 3).type == tokenlib.NUMBER
            ):
                exp_number = toklist.lookahead(e_index + 3).string
                end = toklist.lookahead(e_index + 3).end
            else:
                exp_number = toklist.lookahead(e_index + 2).string
                end = toklist.lookahead(e_index + 2).end
            possible_e = tokenize.TokenInfo(
                type=tokenlib.STRING,
                string=f"e{toklist.lookahead(e_index+1).string}{exp_number}",
                start=possible_e_token.start,
                end=end,
                line=possible_e_token.line,
            )
        else:
            possible_e = None
        return possible_e

    def _apply_e_notation(mantissa, exponent):
        if mantissa.string == "nan":
            return mantissa
        if float(mantissa.string) == 0.0:
            return mantissa
        return tokenize.TokenInfo(
            type=tokenlib.NUMBER,
            string=f"{mantissa.string}{exponent.string}",
            start=mantissa.start,
            end=exponent.end,
            line=exponent.line,
        )

    def _finalize_e(nominal_value, std_dev, toklist, possible_e):
        nominal_value = _apply_e_notation(nominal_value, possible_e)
        std_dev = _apply_e_notation(std_dev, possible_e)
        next(toklist)  # consume 'e' and positive exponent value
        if possible_e.string[1] in ["+", "-"]:
            next(toklist)  # consume "+" or "-" in exponent
            exp_number = next(toklist)  # consume exponent value
            if (
                exp_number.string == "0"
                and toklist.lookahead(0).type == tokenlib.NUMBER
            ):
                exp_number = next(toklist)
                assert exp_number.end == end
                # We've already applied the number, we're just consuming all the tokens
        return nominal_value, std_dev

    # when tokenize encounters whitespace followed by an unknown character,
    # (such as ±) it proceeds to mark every character of the whitespace as ERRORTOKEN,
    # in addition to marking the unknown character as ERRORTOKEN.  Rather than
    # wading through all that vomit, just eliminate the problem
    # in the input by rewriting ± as +/-.
    input_string = input_string.replace("±", "+/-")
    toklist = tokens_with_lookahead(_plain_tokenizer(input_string))
    for tokinfo in toklist:
        line = tokinfo.line
        start = tokinfo.start
        if (
            tokinfo.string == "+"
            and toklist.lookahead(0).string == "/"
            and toklist.lookahead(1).string == "-"
        ):
            plus_minus_op = tokenize.TokenInfo(
                type=tokenlib.OP,
                string="+/-",
                start=start,
                end=toklist.lookahead(1).end,
                line=line,
            )
            for i in range(-1, 1):
                next(toklist)
            yield plus_minus_op
        elif (
            tokinfo.string == "("
            and ((seen_minus := 1 if toklist.lookahead(0).string == "-" else 0) or True)
            and _number_or_nan(toklist.lookahead(seen_minus))
            and toklist.lookahead(seen_minus + 1).string == "+"
            and toklist.lookahead(seen_minus + 2).string == "/"
            and toklist.lookahead(seen_minus + 3).string == "-"
            and _number_or_nan(toklist.lookahead(seen_minus + 4))
            and toklist.lookahead(seen_minus + 5).string == ")"
        ):
            # ( NUM_OR_NAN +/- NUM_OR_NAN ) POSSIBLE_E_NOTATION
            possible_e = _get_possible_e(toklist, seen_minus + 6)
            if possible_e:
                end = possible_e.end
            else:
                end = toklist.lookahead(seen_minus + 5).end
            if seen_minus:
                minus_op = next(toklist)
                yield minus_op
            nominal_value = next(toklist)
            tokinfo = next(toklist)  # consume '+'
            next(toklist)  # consume '/'
            plus_minus_op = tokenize.TokenInfo(
                type=tokenlib.OP,
                string="+/-",
                start=tokinfo.start,
                end=next(toklist).end,  # consume '-'
                line=line,
            )
            std_dev = next(toklist)
            next(toklist)  # consume final ')'
            if possible_e:
                nominal_value, std_dev = _finalize_e(
                    nominal_value, std_dev, toklist, possible_e
                )
            yield nominal_value
            yield plus_minus_op
            yield std_dev
        elif (
            tokinfo.type == tokenlib.NUMBER
            and toklist.lookahead(0).string == "("
            and toklist.lookahead(1).type == tokenlib.NUMBER
            and toklist.lookahead(2).string == ")"
        ):
            # NUM_OR_NAN ( NUM_OR_NAN ) POSSIBLE_E_NOTATION
            possible_e = _get_possible_e(toklist, 3)
            if possible_e:
                end = possible_e.end
            else:
                end = toklist.lookahead(2).end
            nominal_value = tokinfo
            tokinfo = next(toklist)  # consume '('
            plus_minus_op = tokenize.TokenInfo(
                type=tokenlib.OP,
                string="+/-",
                start=tokinfo.start,
                end=tokinfo.end,  # this is funky because there's no "+/-" in nominal(std_dev) notation
                line=line,
            )
            std_dev = next(toklist)
            if "." not in std_dev.string:
                std_dev = tokenize.TokenInfo(
                    type=std_dev.type,
                    string="0." + std_dev.string,
                    start=std_dev.start,
                    end=std_dev.end,
                    line=line,
                )
            next(toklist)  # consume final ')'
            if possible_e:
                nominal_value, std_dev = _finalize_e(
                    nominal_value, std_dev, toklist, possible_e
                )
            yield nominal_value
            yield plus_minus_op
            yield std_dev
        else:
            yield tokinfo


if HAS_UNCERTAINTIES:
    tokenizer = uncertainty_tokenizer
else:
    tokenizer = _plain_tokenizer

import typing

UnaryOpT = typing.Callable[
    [
        Any,
    ],
    Any,
]
BinaryOpT = typing.Callable[[Any, Any], Any]

_UNARY_OPERATOR_MAP: dict[str, UnaryOpT] = {"+": lambda x: x, "-": lambda x: x * -1}

_BINARY_OPERATOR_MAP: dict[str, BinaryOpT] = {
    "+/-": _ufloat,
    "**": _power,
    "*": operator.mul,
    "": operator.mul,  # operator for implicit ops
    "/": operator.truediv,
    "+": operator.add,
    "-": operator.sub,
    "%": operator.mod,
    "//": operator.floordiv,
}


[docs] class EvalTreeNode: """Single node within an evaluation tree left + operator + right --> binary op left + operator --> unary op left + right --> implicit op left --> single value """ def __init__( self, left: EvalTreeNode | TokenInfo, operator: TokenInfo | None = None, right: EvalTreeNode | None = None, ): self.left = left self.operator = operator self.right = right def to_string(self) -> str: # For debugging purposes if self.right: assert isinstance(self.left, EvalTreeNode), "self.left not EvalTreeNode (1)" comps = [self.left.to_string()] if self.operator: comps.append(self.operator.string) comps.append(self.right.to_string()) elif self.operator: assert isinstance(self.left, EvalTreeNode), "self.left not EvalTreeNode (2)" comps = [self.operator.string, self.left.to_string()] else: assert isinstance(self.left, TokenInfo), "self.left not TokenInfo (1)" return self.left.string return "(%s)" % " ".join(comps)
[docs] def evaluate( self, define_op: typing.Callable[ [ Any, ], Any, ], bin_op: dict[str, BinaryOpT] | None = None, un_op: dict[str, UnaryOpT] | None = None, ): """Evaluate node. Parameters ---------- define_op : callable Translates tokens into objects. bin_op : dict or None, optional (Default value = _BINARY_OPERATOR_MAP) un_op : dict or None, optional (Default value = _UNARY_OPERATOR_MAP) Returns ------- """ bin_op = bin_op or _BINARY_OPERATOR_MAP un_op = un_op or _UNARY_OPERATOR_MAP if self.right: assert isinstance(self.left, EvalTreeNode), "self.left not EvalTreeNode (3)" # binary or implicit operator op_text = self.operator.string if self.operator else "" if op_text not in bin_op: raise DefinitionSyntaxError(f"missing binary operator '{op_text}'") return bin_op[op_text]( self.left.evaluate(define_op, bin_op, un_op), self.right.evaluate(define_op, bin_op, un_op), ) elif self.operator: assert isinstance(self.left, EvalTreeNode), "self.left not EvalTreeNode (4)" # unary operator op_text = self.operator.string if op_text not in un_op: raise DefinitionSyntaxError(f"missing unary operator '{op_text}'") return un_op[op_text](self.left.evaluate(define_op, bin_op, un_op)) # single value return define_op(self.left)
from collections.abc import Iterable def _build_eval_tree( tokens: list[TokenInfo], op_priority: dict[str, int], index: int = 0, depth: int = 0, prev_op: str = "<none>", ) -> tuple[EvalTreeNode, int]: """Build an evaluation tree from a set of tokens. Params: Index, depth, and prev_op used recursively, so don't touch. Tokens is an iterable of tokens from an expression to be evaluated. Transform the tokens from an expression into a recursive parse tree, following order of operations. Operations can include binary ops (3 + 4), implicit ops (3 kg), or unary ops (-1). General Strategy: 1) Get left side of operator 2) If no tokens left, return final result 3) Get operator 4) Use recursion to create tree starting at token on right side of operator (start at step #1) 4.1) If recursive call encounters an operator with lower or equal priority to step #2, exit recursion 5) Combine left side, operator, and right side into a new left side 6) Go back to step #2 Raises ------ DefinitionSyntaxError If there is a syntax error. """ result = None while True: current_token = tokens[index] token_type = current_token.type token_text = current_token.string if token_type == tokenlib.OP: if token_text == ")": if prev_op == "<none>": raise DefinitionSyntaxError( f"unopened parentheses in tokens: {current_token}" ) elif prev_op == "(": # close parenthetical group assert result is not None return result, index else: # parenthetical group ending, but we need to close sub-operations within group assert result is not None return result, index - 1 elif token_text == "(": # gather parenthetical group right, index = _build_eval_tree( tokens, op_priority, index + 1, 0, token_text ) if not tokens[index][1] == ")": raise DefinitionSyntaxError("weird exit from parentheses") if result: # implicit op with a parenthetical group, i.e. "3 (kg ** 2)" result = EvalTreeNode(left=result, right=right) else: # get first token result = right elif token_text in op_priority: if result: # equal-priority operators are grouped in a left-to-right order, # unless they're exponentiation, in which case they're grouped # right-to-left this allows us to get the expected behavior for # multiple exponents # (2^3^4) --> (2^(3^4)) # (2 * 3 / 4) --> ((2 * 3) / 4) if op_priority[token_text] <= op_priority.get( prev_op, -1 ) and token_text not in ("**", "^"): # previous operator is higher priority, so end previous binary op return result, index - 1 # get right side of binary op right, index = _build_eval_tree( tokens, op_priority, index + 1, depth + 1, token_text ) result = EvalTreeNode( left=result, operator=current_token, right=right ) else: # unary operator right, index = _build_eval_tree( tokens, op_priority, index + 1, depth + 1, "unary" ) result = EvalTreeNode(left=right, operator=current_token) elif token_type in (tokenlib.NUMBER, tokenlib.NAME): if result: # tokens with an implicit operation i.e. "1 kg" if op_priority[""] <= op_priority.get(prev_op, -1): # previous operator is higher priority than implicit, so end # previous binary op return result, index - 1 right, index = _build_eval_tree( tokens, op_priority, index, depth + 1, "" ) result = EvalTreeNode(left=result, right=right) else: # get first token result = EvalTreeNode(left=current_token) if tokens[index][0] == tokenlib.ENDMARKER: if prev_op == "(": raise DefinitionSyntaxError("unclosed parentheses in tokens") if depth > 0 or prev_op: # have to close recursion assert result is not None return result, index else: # recursion all closed, so just return the final result assert result is not None return result, -1 if index + 1 >= len(tokens): # should hit ENDMARKER before this ever happens raise DefinitionSyntaxError("unexpected end to tokens") index += 1
[docs] def build_eval_tree( tokens: Iterable[TokenInfo], op_priority: dict[str, int] | None = None, ) -> EvalTreeNode: """Build an evaluation tree from a set of tokens. Params: Index, depth, and prev_op used recursively, so don't touch. Tokens is an iterable of tokens from an expression to be evaluated. Transform the tokens from an expression into a recursive parse tree, following order of operations. Operations can include binary ops (3 + 4), implicit ops (3 kg), or unary ops (-1). General Strategy: 1) Get left side of operator 2) If no tokens left, return final result 3) Get operator 4) Use recursion to create tree starting at token on right side of operator (start at step #1) 4.1) If recursive call encounters an operator with lower or equal priority to step #2, exit recursion 5) Combine left side, operator, and right side into a new left side 6) Go back to step #2 Raises ------ DefinitionSyntaxError If there is a syntax error. """ if op_priority is None: op_priority = _OP_PRIORITY if not isinstance(tokens, list): # ensure tokens is list so we can access by index tokens = list(tokens) result, _ = _build_eval_tree(tokens, op_priority, 0, 0) return result